PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SRM (SEARCHING, READING, MAPPING) BERBASIS HOTS UNTUK PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP PADA MAHASISWA PAUD

Eva Riza, Putri Ratih Puspitasari, Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan

Abstract


Pembelajaran terkait Pendidikan lingkungan hidup pada mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini (PAUD) memerlukan inovasi untuk pengembangan lebih lanjut. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan model SRM untuk Pendidikan lingkungan hidup pada mahasiswa PAUD agar HOTS mengalami peningkatan. Metode penelitian kuantitatif dengan populasi dari penelitian ini adalah seluruh mahasiswa PAUD di Jakarta Timur. Sampel yang digunakan adalah mahasiswa PAUD dengan status aktif (bukan cuti). Sampel dipilih secara acak dengan Teknik sampling random sampling. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa model SRM memiliki kategori valid dan layak digunakan dalam pembelajaran. Model SRM sebagai sebuah solusi memberikan sebuah pandangan tentang betapa pentingnya kemampuan mahasiswa pada abad 21 yang harus dikembangkan dalam hal ini berpikir kritis dan berpikir kreatif. Kemampuan ini perlu dilatih agar mahasiswa memiliki keampuan dalam memcahkan masalah yang sedang dihadapi saat ini

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A. H., Mun, S. H., Mokhtar, M., Ashari, Z. M., Jumaat, N. F., Ali, D. F., Samah, N. A., & Abdurrahman, M. S. (2020). Using active learning with smart board to enhance primary school students’ higher order thinking skills in data handling. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4421–4432. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081009

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airiasian, W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. In Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology University of Georgia (Vol. 53, Issue 9). Springer.

Chen, S. J., Chou, Y. C., Yen, H. Y., & Chao, Y. L. (2015). Investigating and structural modeling energy literacy of high school students in Taiwan. Energy Efficiency, 8(4), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-015-9327-5

Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082

Djamahar, R., Ristanto, R. H., Sartono, N., Ichsan, I. Z., & Muhlisin, A. (2018). CIRSA : Designing Instructional Kits to Empower 21 st Century Skill. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(3), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.73.4

Fitriati, F., Marlaini, M., & Elizar, E. (2021). Integrating rich task into the mathematics classroom to develop students’ higher order thinking skills: A collaborative action research study in a secondary school. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 479–494. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.042

Hadzhikolev, E., Hadzhikoleva, S., Yotov, K., & Orozova, D. (2020). Models for Multicomponent Fuzzy Evaluation, with a Focus on the Assessment of Higher-Order Thinking Skills. TEM Journal, 9(4), 1656–1662. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-43

Husamah, Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018a). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11217a

Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018b). OIDDE learning model: improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11217a

Indawati, N. (2015). The Development of Anti-Corruption Education Course for Primary School Teacher Education Students. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 48–54.

Khoiriyah, A. J., & Husamah, H. (2018). Problem-based learning: creative thinking skills, problem-solving skills, and learning outcome of seventh grade students. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5804

Maclean, R., & Pavlova, M. (2017). What type of pedagogy is required in schools and classrooms to support sustainable green growth? A case study of Hong Kong within the international context. In Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Vol. 38, pp. 101–119). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3654-5_7

Mahardika, I. K., Rasagama, I. G., Indrianto, L., Doyan, A., & Supeno. (2020). Validity of physical learning module based on multiple representation and higher order thinking skills (W. D. (ed.); Vol. 1465, Issue 1). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012057

Marconi, A., Schiavo, G., Zancanaro, M., Valetto, G., & Pistore, M. (2018). Exploring the world through small green steps: Improving sustainable school transportation with a game-based learning interface (C. T., M. A., L. F., & M. M. (eds.)). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206505.3206521

Motallebzadeh, K., Ahmadi, F., & Hosseinnia, M. (2018). Relationship between 21st century skills, speaking and writing skills: A structural equation modelling approach. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11319a

Rahayu, E., Susanto, H., & Yulianti, D. (2011). Pembelajaran Sains Dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 7, 106–110. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPFI.V7I2.1081

Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Utomo, H. B. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure the higher order thinking skill in physics. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.743

Sadiqin, I. K., Santoso, U. T., & Sholahuddin, A. (2017). Students ’ difficulties on science learning with prototype problem-solving based teaching and learning material : a study evaluation of development research. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 100, 279–282.

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a

Saputro, A. D., Irwanto, Sri Atun, & Wilujeng, I. (2019). The impact of problem solving instruction on academic achievement and science process skills among prospective elementary teachers. Elementary Education Online, 18(2), 496–507. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2019.561896

Subramaniam, P., Sulaiman, T., & Kamarudin, N. (2020). Relationship between higher order thinking and metacognitive skills with hands-on teaching among primary school science teachers in Jempol district. ASM Science Journal, 13. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2020.SM26(2.19)

Talmi, I., Hazzan, O., & Katz, R. (2018). Intrinsic motivation and 21st-century skills in an undergraduate engineering project: the formula student project. Higher Education Studies, 8(4), 46. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v8n4p46

Wikanta, W., & Susilo, H. (2022). Higher Order Thinking Skills Achievement for Biology Education Students in Case-Based Biochemistry Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15445a

Yang, K. K., Lee, L., Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2016). Investigation of effective strategies for developing creative science thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1230685

Zohar, A., & Agmon, V. A. (2018). Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (hot): senior science teachers’ views on how several concurrent policies affect classroom practices. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1395332

Zulfiani, Suwarna, I. P., & Sumantri, M. F. (2020). Science adaptive assessment tool: Kolb’s learning style profile and student’s higher order thinking skill level. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23840




DOI: https://doi.org/10.46368/bjpd.v4i2.1494

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 51 times
PDF - 29 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.